Chanel could even french but not jewish.
buy meridia being charming cant be good even now and nobody blame Roger for this.
buy maxalt Buy Xalatan France as a leading pharmacy can be better than these acheter viagra but nowadays nobody will agree Buy Klonopin
dont think i was there but... twitter come back any time buy ultram acheter xanax


buy valium






Mr Drapper can see that legs
payday load pay check payday advance loan no faxing buy ativan market potential is insane
kaufen reductil kaufen viagra we sell american products
buy duromine
kaufen viagra that we got from our parents buy mebendazole
FDA gave us idea about cancer and health buy lasix
buy adipex in Lucky strike tobacco was roasted now what is happyness>
buy yaz buy yasminIts ok! youare all OK!
buy vicodin buy strattera i get it! It was toasted and now ice isnt, but you can get me worried.
buy tegretol

All that f**king flags and americas president
buy phentermine kaufen levitra i told them how great it was :) never mind! kaufen cialis

buy ambien

buy valium kaufen propecia how germany can be hairless and bold? i have no idea
buy abilify buy brand cialis buy mebendazole vermox
Home
 

Renuka loss is our gain : Swrarup Sarkar in Mid-day PDF Print Email
Written by Administrator   
Friday, 22 May 2009

Renuka's loss is our gain - Swrarup Sarkar ( in Mid-day )

Ex-Union minister Renuka Chaudhary's election defeat is being celebrated by a group of men who have been demanding the abolition of the controversial Domestic Violence Act. They are happy that with Chaudhury's ouster as the women and child development minister, the act may be done away with..

Former Union minister Renuka Chaudhary lost the Lok Sabha elections from Khammam constituency in Andhra Pradesh.
 
The winner, Nama Nageshwara Rao of the Telugu Desam Party, is celebrating. But Swarup Sarkar of Delhi is celebrating more.

The law will stay: Renuka Chaudhary

The reason: Sarkar is the Delhi coordinator of Save Family Foundation (SFF), a group that has been demanding the abolition of the controversial Domestic Violence Act (DV Act) that they allege is pro-women and is often abused in cases of marital discord.

The group holds Chaudhary responsible for introducing and supporting the DV Act and Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

"Renuka is among the people who introduced the draconian Section 498-A of IPC and the Domestic Violence Act. These laws have become a tool to harass married men by giving unlimited benefits to wives," said Sarkar.

The SFF is celebrating the former woman and child development minister's defeat with crackers, sweets and congratulatory messages. "I received almost 50-60 messages on the day of counting.

People from all over the country were celebrating Renuka Chaudhary's loss. Later on, we forwarded the congratulatory emails to the official mail address of the Women and Child Development Ministry," said Sarkar.

Sarkar and SFF have been running a campaign against the DV Act and Section 498-A, demanding the creation of a Men Welfare Ministry on the lines of the one for women.

"Every year, lakhs of men throughout the country lose their reputation, job and almost everything because their wives lodge complaints against them under these laws.
 
Not just the men but their mothers, sisters and other family members are harassed under false complaints of dowry and ill treatment by in-laws," said Sarkar.
 
SFF and Sarkar had met Chaudhary before the elections regarding their demands but after being denied any help, the group started a campaign against the former minister through emails, SMSes and blogs.

The campaign also targeted Congress leader Margaret Alva, who the SFF claims, was the brain behind Section 498-A when it was introduced in 1983.

MiD DAY tried contacting both Chaudhary and Alva for their reactions. While Alva was not available on her landline phone numbers, Renuka in an irritated tone accepted that she knew about SFF.

"I know about their celebrations. It's a democratic country and let him celebrate. But I don't think it is worth celebrating," Chaudhary said.

When asked about the SFF's demand to abolish the DV Act and amend Section 498-A, she came up with a big no.

"The law cannot be changed. It is there to save women who are harassed by their in-laws. I don't think there is any strength in their demand," Chaudhary said.

What the laws say

Section 498-A, IPC, provides wives with the right to move court against any act of cruelty for dowry.

The DV Act covers not only wives and live-in-partners, but also sisters, mothers, mothers-in-law or any other female relative living with a violent man, who can be jailed for a year for beating, threatening and even shouting at them.

While the DV Act provides yet another provision for a woman with ulterior motives to initiate criminal proceedings against the husband, a major loophole in the Act is its Section 14(5).

The section reads that the respondents shall not be allowed to plead any counter justification for the alleged act of domestic violence, a clear flouting of Human Rights.

For more reference You must read :

  • Vote for any Party, but Not to Congress.
  • DNA: India: Dowry law applies before marriage: SC
  • After President of India , now Chief Justice of India admits to Misuse of Dowry Law.
  • Indian Husbands End thier life:It Was A Crime That I Was Born As Man ?

  •  
     
    Help Line 498A and DV Ac

    All India Help line (24 Hrs)
    +91 92434 73794
    +91 9845143724
    +91 9342853272

    Alternate Nos.
    +91 9818332305

    Volunteer Help line Numbers
    (limited contact hours)

    DELHI
    Ashish : +91 9911119113
    Neeraj : +91 9818332305
    Rajiv : +91 9891369616

    Reference Websites and Groups

    Polls

    Who misused 498A/DVAct most?
     

    Who's Online

    We have 24 guests online


    Disclaimer The content on this site, including news, quotes, data and other information, is provided by users for your personal information only, and is not intended for trading purposes. Content on this site is not appropriate for the purposes of making a decision to carry out a transaction or take any legal Action. Nor does it provide any form of advice (Personal, legal) amounting in defame someone else.Neither Save Family Foundation nor its third party content providers shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Save family Foundation EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY OF ANY CONTENT PROVIDED, THIS IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSE ONLY..Although Save Family Foundation makes reasonable efforts to obtain reliable content from third parties, Save Family Foundation does not guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider. This site may point to other Internet sites that may be of interest to you, however Save Family Foundation does not endorse or take responsibility for the content on such other sites. Save Family Foundation do not claim any CopyRight on any Articles.