Chanel could even french but not jewish.
buy meridia being charming cant be good even now and nobody blame Roger for this.
buy maxalt Buy Xalatan France as a leading pharmacy can be better than these acheter viagra but nowadays nobody will agree Buy Klonopin
dont think i was there but... twitter come back any time buy ultram acheter xanax


buy valium






Mr Drapper can see that legs
payday load pay check payday advance loan no faxing buy ativan market potential is insane
kaufen reductil kaufen viagra we sell american products
buy duromine
kaufen viagra that we got from our parents buy mebendazole
FDA gave us idea about cancer and health buy lasix
buy adipex in Lucky strike tobacco was roasted now what is happyness>
buy yaz buy yasminIts ok! youare all OK!
buy vicodin buy strattera i get it! It was toasted and now ice isnt, but you can get me worried.
buy tegretol

All that f**king flags and americas president
buy phentermine kaufen levitra i told them how great it was :) never mind! kaufen cialis

buy ambien

buy valium kaufen propecia how germany can be hairless and bold? i have no idea
buy abilify buy brand cialis buy mebendazole vermox
Home
 

Details of Dowry Law Cases for the year 2007 (Source - NCRB) PDF Print Email
Written by Swarup Sarkar   
Tuesday, 02 December 2008
Details of Dowry Law Cases for the year 2007 (Source - NCRB)
    
S. No.Description2007%age
    
1No. of Person Arrested under (498A +304B)*215733100%
    
2Child- Under 18 Years4570.21%
    
3Senior Citizen-Above 60 Years67643%
    
4Women4045119%
    
5No of Persons arrested under 304B*2819313%
    
6No of persons arrested under 498A18754087%
    
7No of persons chargesheet16504077%
    
8No of persons arrested but not chargesheeted88574%
    
9Under investigation41836 
    
10No of persons under trial * in 498A and 304B IPC750736 
    
11No of persons who have completed the trial (498A + 304B)10474549%
    
 No of persons completed trial only in 304B16816 
    
 No of persons who have completed trial only in 498A87929 
    
12No of persons convicted under 498A and 304B1882718%
    
13No of persons convicted under only 304B558033%
    
14No of persons convicted only in 498A**1324715%
    
15No of persons whose case acquitted / discharged only in 498A7468285%
    
16Only 498A case of living women court found guilty after trail ( 87-85)% 2%
    
17No of persons whose cases have been compounded or withdrawn137396%
    
 % of Person found not guilty vs Arrest in 498A on average 94%
 *Total no of persons under arrest including those in previous year  
 ** Person convicted under 304B are also convicted under 498A  
 hence, those convicted only in 498A is 12-13  
    
 Hightlights :   
 1.  94% of the people arrested were found not guilty (pre & post trial).  
 2.  85% found not guilty after the completion of the trial - but these 85% were also arrested without any investigation. Maximum convection in 498A in case of 304B( 18827 trial), where the person allready spend more than 1 year Jail, but proved their innocence in 304B, but convected in 498A by defult to neturilise the Jail term.
    
    
Source : http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2007/cii-2007/table12.htm  
    

 


Details of Dowry Law Cases for the year 2007 (Source - NCRB)

Details of Dowry Law Cases for the year 2007 (Source - NCRB)

Source : http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2007/cii-2007/table12.htm

Click Here to get the Summary Data and Anylisis.

It is a clear example, those cases gone to trail 498A along with 304B, approx 94% cases people proved their innocence at Court that they had been arrested without any reason/evidence as 498A/304B is non-bailable and do not need any evidence to arrest any TOM/Dick or Marry .

When we compare only 498A cases, specially for living women without any 304B in dowry realted law, 87% people arrested and among that 85% proved thier innocence in court. Means court found hardly 2% wife’s complint as true. Maximum convections under 498A is along with 304B , where the person proved his innocence in 304B, but as he had allready gone through in Jail under trail, court convected them under 498A as by defult on assumptions based view only , just to justify thier Jail terms during under trail, so that they can’t calim any damarage form the Goverment.

Where as if the case is true and the verbal statement of the compliment itself find true, the convection is 100%.

Still in this special LAW more than 94% People proved their innocence, where as in normal IPC the convection is more than such LAW, then why need this special LAW?

The Answer : To do the Legal Terrorism and earn the money from Husband’s Family as a whole sale free license and openly Blackmail and do the extortion of money by Wives family in front of Police/Court/Media and the same is not to be termed as crime.

We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women?

Crime Bure data 2005 : Married Men Sucide : 52k vs Married Women Sucide 28K.Still there is no LAW to Protect Men why?

2006 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:55452 vs. Married Women Sucide:29869.

2007 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:57593 vs. Married Women Sucide:30064.

Will Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B( dowry death) to 304C( Sowry Death) and 498A ( harrasement to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harrasement by wife) ?


Review Gender Biased LAW to Promote Family Harmony and Stop Legal Terrorism

Last Updated ( 2008-12-12 08:46:55 )
 
 
Help Line 498A and DV Ac

All India Help line (24 Hrs)
+91 92434 73794
+91 9845143724
+91 9342853272

Alternate Nos.
+91 9818332305

Volunteer Help line Numbers
(limited contact hours)

DELHI
Ashish : +91 9911119113
Neeraj : +91 9818332305
Rajiv : +91 9891369616

Reference Websites and Groups

Polls

Who misused 498A/DVAct most?
 

Who's Online

We have 23 guests online


Disclaimer The content on this site, including news, quotes, data and other information, is provided by users for your personal information only, and is not intended for trading purposes. Content on this site is not appropriate for the purposes of making a decision to carry out a transaction or take any legal Action. Nor does it provide any form of advice (Personal, legal) amounting in defame someone else.Neither Save Family Foundation nor its third party content providers shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Save family Foundation EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY OF ANY CONTENT PROVIDED, THIS IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSE ONLY..Although Save Family Foundation makes reasonable efforts to obtain reliable content from third parties, Save Family Foundation does not guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider. This site may point to other Internet sites that may be of interest to you, however Save Family Foundation does not endorse or take responsibility for the content on such other sites. Save Family Foundation do not claim any CopyRight on any Articles.