|
But the question is unanswered , what for this fund allocated ? Is it for promote the Legal Terrorism and file more and more false, fabricated sexual harassment , Domestic violence Act, 498A and extort the money from Indian Men and Corporate world? We have wittiness in the last year whatever money they have got from the government , used only to promote the Legal Terrorism or spend to do the seminar at Five star Hotel or flying to foreigner country to import more and more Blood cancer Virus to destroy the basic institution of marriage in India and promotion of Father less society , promotion of use of Condom , whole sale free licence to go for multiple sex partners in the name of so called women empowerment , as our minister do not forget to advice all the women, do not trust your man, trust condom , giving so called Free Legal Aid through Women NGO and even harassed the Corporate CEO, MD, Chairman's. It is a clear evidence that in India the financial Burden to a Indian men let he is a Daily Labour of a Corporate CEO , is at least 5 times more than any same type of Indian women. A Man have to take the financial burden for his child/wife/parents/sisters , they have to go to those hard Job including Army ( more than 98% are men, why so called women activist do not demand 50% reservation in India Army, is the unaswared question) , Indian men have to work day and night, face all type of harassment at office by boss, at field by customers and when come back to home , continuous nagging form their wives, he is good for nothing , no 9AM to 6 Pm Jobs as on today for Indian Men , as those Jobs 9AM to 6 PM specially reserved officially or un-officially for the so called working women. Logically , if our Finance minister had been look, he should had give the more Tax relief to a Indian working man than a Indian working women, because the financial burden to a Indian working man are at least 5 times more than a working women. But we see the tax exemption for a working women is 1.8 Lacks and for Indian Man it is 1.5 Lacks. Ideally it should have been 1.65 Lacks for all. Or Our Finance Ministers think that the money earned by man is water and the money earn by a women is Blood? Practically , we know in case of any dispute also , it is the women who get free tax free income in the from of so called maintenance, residence, alimony under Crpc125/ DV Act , not even form the husband, even from her Father-in-law, Brother-in-law , in case the husband are not alive . On the other hand we can wittiness today more than 55% divorce case filed by women and today we are desperate to term the same is not a dirty word any more , it was a dirty word as long as Man filed more divorce cases. Now we wittiness in spite of in increase of basic commodity , our corporate houses offered maximum support to common people ( without any biased men vs women) , but they paid the price for giving higher taxes . Result no Tax relief to those corporates. So , let the corporate burden with more and more Taxes and never able to make a profit , in result , wonder if Corporate do not make profit, what for they will give us higher salary? So , the question we have to find : Why Indian Budget:2008-2009 Anti men and Anti Corporate ? - They main reason they do not go to put their Vote during Election.
- They do not Burn the buses or Block the roads.
- They do not have free time to do the show at Media.
- They silently end their life , result more and more Indian men are ending their life in this country.
Once the same question raised in front of Supreme court and Chief Justice said : Women pay less taxes as man do not wear Sari. But he might have not thought that a women who wear sari , more than 90% cases it is the man buy for them that sari and those women do not wear sari.. are they pay more taxes? May be Finance minster think that it was a crime for Indian man and corporate world they have not taken the Violent protest against them or had not run Naked in the Road and run to Police stations to blackmail them. Let people decide their own , Why Indian Budget:2008-2009 Anti men and Anti Corporate ? Do not forget to give the answer , when the chance comes to You at the time of Election , as we know maximum you you do not go for Vote , prefer to sit at Home or get busy to bay a Sari/Gold/Diamond for even your working wife , though she pay less tax than you. If you question that in your home , you will be booked under so called Domestic Violence act, if you go to Beauty parlor or Kitty party once in a month and spend some money it will be termed as Domestic Violence ( Economical Abuse) , and if your wife go to Beauty Parlor or Kitty party , every week and spend 10 times more than you , you have to silently pay the same also , let the money have in your pocket or you take Loan and if you end your life , police will term it as a Sucide as a Finciancial Burden, but if your wife sicide , not only you , your mother/sisters/sister's child will be termed as hard core criminla under so called Dowry death and will be put behind the bar without a question , after all as "A Indian Man" you are a Free ATM Machine and in this country no "Men Well Fare ministry" available to rise your pain. LIFE STYLE GAP: - Women's average annual earned income was US$1,471 in 2002, almost three times less than the average for men of US$4,723, but still shopping malls dominated by women more than 75% buying capacity. Indian Men's only responsibility: Working like a Donkey for day night and their female members are spending the same like free water. Result Indian Men are ending their life faster than women by more than 1.7 times over all statistics. This is called enjoying the lavish life style without hard working and earning and whole wrold have to learn from Indian so called radical Women activists. Why Indian Budget:2008-2009 Anti men and Anti Corporate ?
Reference: Is this not Misuse of Tax-Prayer Money by Women and Child Minsitry? TIMES NEWS NETWORK (Page 13, TOI, New Delhi)
New Delhi: A flagship scheme for children is likely to be jeopardised, thanks to government apathy. The women and child development ministry has been sanctioned Rs 90 crore for implementation of the Integrated Child Protection Scheme but with hardly any child protection units to implement it, the scheme could meet a fatal end. ICPS is a rights-based approach to introduce both prevention and protection for children from all walks of life. The scheme can only be implemented through child protection units in each state. Each unit is an agency consisting of people from the police, state, judicial members and non-government organisations. According to the Juvenile Justice Act, 2006, each state is expected to have a panel that will ensure rescue and rehabilitation of children found deserted, abandoned, in distress or delinquents. However, the ministry has no record of how many states are running such units. Replying to a RTI query posed by NGO Pratidhi’s Raj Mangal Prasad, the WCD ministry has admitted that it does not maintain such information. Explaining this, a WCD spokesperson said, “We have asked states to maintain a record. Our work is to monitor their overall functioning.” The panel also seems to be a low priority for state governments. Amongst the state governments, only 10 have replied. Amongst these, none have constituted a CPU. These include Karnataka, Maharashtra, Haryana, Kerala, Bihar, Delhi, Jharkhand, Goa, West Bengal and Orissa.
|